The Dropkicks is a rugby podcast and sports blog site illuminating your path through the murky world of international rugby, league, cricket, football, baseball, motorsports, golf, netball and competitive eating.
By now you've seen the All Blacks' win over France, or at least heard about it from someone who saw it. You know the scoreline, 39-12. You've watched the All Blacks' attack absolutely dismantle the French defense. You've had described to you the scrums, which started off horribly and turned into an even contest. You heard about the rucks and the brilliance of Richie McCaw and Kieran Read in that area. But you've paid most attention to Sivivatu, Mils and Jane, who were in blazing form.
That was the difference between this test and all the others I think. The forwards were not as dominant as they have been in past tests, particularly against Australia, Cowan was his usual exceptional self, Carter ran as well as always [when he did], Nonu was his normal rhinoceros persona charging at the line.
But when a deep kick was fielded, it was returned by that player. It wasn't kicked back with a midfield bomb, nor was it spread across the field [a tactic which doesn't work anymore].
Sivi, Mils and Jane backed themselves. And it paid off. You could see their confidence lift [not that it was lacking] as each return reaped more and more reward. Look at Mils try where Sivi faked a kick to draw the defender! The three of them all scored tries in the game, the first time this has happened against a tier-one side since 2003's Rugby World Cup match against France [Mils, Rokocoko and Howlett got a try apiece. For the historians among us, the back three have scored against tier-two nations twice between now and then - Rokocoko, Evans and Sivi against Romania at the 2007 RWC and in 2005, Sivi, Mils and Howlett each grabbed a 5-pointer against Fiji.]
The thing which got to me though was in the final 10 minutes. France would receive a full-arm penalty within our half and take the kick at goal. Why? You'd broken our line throughout the game, only to have stoic defense hold you out from. You'd kept the ball in hand and barely played the territory game.
The answer is obvious, of course. They gave up. Conrad Smith put the final nail in the coffin and the French knew they didn't have a chance. But still - would it not have been good to be the team that does what no team has done for two years [not just under Wayne Smith] and score a try against the ABs? If you don't ask questions of them, you'll never make them crack.
As for Smith, he and Donnelly were my MVP picks for this match. Sure, you had everyone I've already mentioned but Smith's distribution and option-taking were perfect and as Tracey Nelson's stats show, he was a beast on defense. Donnelly I pick because he was consistent. If he wasn't in the first three to the breakdown, he was with the next couple. He had a few useful touches of the ball and was great at protecting it.
Highlights thanks to RugbyDump:
Tri Nations Game 2 Review: All Blacks v South Africa
noizy says: Surely the 60mins sub thing is just R&R in disguise? ...
- reply
Tuesday, 01 Dec 2009 — jimmy (not verified)A lot of people talk up BOD as being the best centre in the world, but for my money its got to be Smith at the moment. The way he coordinates the defence is brilliant, and in this game he showed he's still got the ability to glide through a gap on attack as well.
This was a brilliant game, but before we go over the top I think we probably ought to err on the side of caution. That wasn't a great French performance and they played a style of rugby against us that most other teams wont.
- reply
Tuesday, 01 Dec 2009 — MarieWell, I'm agreed with some of what you're saying but I do feel that I have to clear some point when you say, I quote
would it not have been good to be the team that does what no team has done for two years [not just under Wayne Smith] and score a try against the Abs?
as far as it goes for the French team and even if I like that player, they did ask the good question in the first place, but some "invisible" King was taking a walk, just, at that moment lolll : )
Now, I do think that that record had a price for the All Blacks.
- reply
Tuesday, 01 Dec 2009 — Jimmy (not verified)I'm going to be completely one-eyed and say that the Richie McCaw thing was nothing. He was retiring back onside perfectly legally and then the ball was thrown into his back. If they'd thrown it to the player instead they might have actually challenged the line.
Post new comment