User login

Navigation

RSS/XML/Podcast Stuff

About

The Dropkicks is a rugby podcast and sports blog site illuminating your path through the murky world of international rugby, league, cricket, football, baseball, motorsports, golf, netball and competitive eating.

Email us

The Dropkicks Team

More of us at...

A message to you

Posted by Triple T on Sunday, 20 Jan 2008.

One of myths repeated during the recent Rugby World Cup was the "losing girlfriend" scenario. It normally states that whenever the All Blacks (or another team) loses, incidents of bashed wives and girlfriends turning up at emergency departments or women's refugees increases.

What's so annoying about this myth is that while there's no evidence for it, it just kind of sounds like common sense. Sports fans tend to be higher in testosterone that say, fans of fine arts, or poets, so you expect a little more argie-bargie. And, as the Dick of the Week slot on the podcast regularly illustrates, some sports fans and players are just freaking stupid, or outright violent. This means that the possibility that partner-bashing goes on is increased by the actual behaviour of fans.

Evidence or not, the Dropkicks aren't too happy out it.

One of things that could be the case is that sports losses don't cause domestic violence, but are a trigger for violence in homes where it already occurs. This means that if you're already the kind of asshole who slaps the missus, then a bad result on your team's big day out increases the chance you'll need to do it again. But, there's no proof either way, which is highly frustrating. Personally I'd like to be able to say that rugby can't be linked to domestic violence, because the last thing I want is to be associated with the kind of bastard who bashes a women.

Well, bad news. A recent study in the US demonstrated clearly that sports events do increase violence and anti-social behaviour. And worse, they're regarded as causing the behaviour.

Some researchers at the Denver University Department of Economics have published a paper that clearly links increased assault and vandalism to upset losses, with a corresponding increase in anti-social and non-violent-but-outright-stupid behaviour like drink driving. Terrific. The paper also argues that you can't blame this increase on fans getting loaded and misbehaving, because while alcohol is a factor, it is not the cause of the chaos that seems to ensure after a loss.

Unfortunately there is no indication in the paper that women are suffering because of sports, but this is only because the researchers don't seem to have the available data. Once again, it might be that violent relationships are just plain worse on loss days. But this paper could also be read to suggest that some non-violent relationships could become violent after a loss.

Terrific.

So what is there left to say? "Just behave, you idiots."

­


RugbyBlips: vote it up!

so is there "no evidence for it" , "no proof either way" or "increased assault and vandalism to upset losses"?

"sports losses don't cause domestic violence, but are a trigger for violence in homes where it already occurs" or "some non-violent relationships could become violent after a loss".

what the hell is the point of this post? are we wife beaters-in-waiting? one deafeat from giving the misses one to go on with, or are we the vitims of association by way of the wife beaters love of the oval ball game?

this isnt meant to sound facaecious, but what point are you trying to make here? hitting girls is bad? sport makes you hit girls? sport makes girl hitters hit girls more? all of the above?

hmm... big reaction there anonymous.

the point is, "we still don't have evidence that a boofhead's team losing causes him to smack the missus". we don't have any answers to any of the questions in your last paragraph.

but, there is a suggestion from the article i linked to (assuming you read it) that it could be a trigger.

It's pretty good report in that the methodology can be easily replicated anywhere and with any sport (including in New Zealand with rugby). The results are slightly interesting too:

Our results suggest that the host community registers sharp increases in assaults on game days. In addition, there is evidence that vandalism, arrests for disorderly conduct, and alcohol-related arrests increase on game days, but no support for the hypothesis that away games are related to offenses. The largest estimated effects are found when an upset occurs, defined as when an unranked team beat a ranked team or when a lower-ranked team beat a higher-ranked team.

Some portion of the relationship between home games and offenses may be mechanical in nature, due to the fact that home games often attract a temporary, but substantial, influx of people from outside the host community. However, the results with regard to upsets suggest that fans react to the outcome of games. In the next section we discuss the potential links between sporting events and crime, paying special attention to the psychological theories of spectator aggression.

However, College Football is a different animal to many sporting cultures, especially in the pre-game parties etc.

I wouldn't call this a definitive answer to the "does sport cause violence" question but it is a good start.

i was thinking the same thing about the methodology.

do you reckon it would be possible to get police stats for the nzl cities with major sports grounds?

Incredibly easy

OOO, Interesting story))

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <img> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <strike>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Rugby Video from 3News.co.nz

Recent comments

New forum topics

Active forum topics

Poll

Latest posts elsewhere...

The Dropkicks are proudly brought
to you by Epic Beer.

online sports betting

in association with sportsfreak

Good mates of the Dropkicks